A National Charter Without Fear
On Friday, May 20th, we woke to the happy news that the legislature of the great state of Oklahoma passed a law prohibiting abortion from the moment of conception (the only exceptions being rape and incest), and the governor said he would sign it. This was the law of my state of Maryland prior to Roe v. Wade taking it off the books in 1973 (indeed, all states criminalized abortion prior to 1973).
Oklahoma is leading the way for the nation and the Supreme Court needs to follow their example and rewrite this draft opinion according to our nation’s own Declaration of Independence as authority for the fact that preborn children’s lives are constitutionally protected from the moment of conception:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…”
President Ronald Reagan was understanding this, and in his National Sanctity of Human Life Day Proclamation, issued on the 14th of January, 1988, his words in the closing paragraph thereof have become known as the “Emancipation Proclamation of Preborn Children”.
President Reagan was undoubtedly familiar with the teachings of renowned constitutional law scholar John W. Brabner-Smith, of Washington, DC, whom we spoke of in our May letter. He taught his students at the International School of Law in Washington which he founded; that the Declaration of Independence is like the charter for our nation, and that the Constitution are like the bylaws of our nation.
It is an established principle of law that nothing in the bylaws of an organization can contradict the charter. In 1973, the Supreme Court bent over backwards, reading between the lines of the Civil War 14th amendment to declare a ‘right’ to abortion under the Constitution, and in so doing, flagrantly ignored the words of the Declaration of Independence that revered and protected preborn children, which were as plain as the nose on their faces.
The present Supreme Court is now compelled to strike down Roe as an egregious error, but in its place they must not leave a vacuum which would promote discord and dissent among the states by leaving it up to each state to decide.
When we established the nation, we didn’t say that all men will be viewed as being created equal in those colonies that believed it. We stated a truth that applied to all the colonies at the same time. Truth is universal. We can’t pick and choose. Indeed, the truths in our Declaration of Independence have been acknowledged worldwide.
The devil and his emissaries would put a spirit of fear in the Supreme Court – fear that would keep them from declaring the TRUTH that preborn human beings are recognized under our nation’s Declaration of Independence as being CREATED EQUAL and endowed by their CREATOR with… a right to life and liberty…
Pray that God will take away that spirit of fear and give the justices His Spirit of power, and of love, and of a sound mind (2 Tim. 1:7).
The court is now poised at a critical tipping point. Perhaps it’s good that the draft opinion was leaked because it would be a mistake as written. The court has the Declaration of Independence on its side. The court has the truth of medical science and genetics on its side; that life begins, like everything else, at the beginning. They can say it however they want and put these truths together however they want, but we need one truth for one nation in accord with our nation’s pledge “One Nation under God”.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
R. Martin Palmer
March For Life – New Route?
Dear friends and family of the preborn child,
Many people are asking the question “Since the Supreme Court is poised to overturn Roe, will there be a March for Life to the Supreme Court this coming January?” The answer is “There could be and should be if the March was from the Ellipse to the Lincoln Memorial instead of the Supreme Court”.
The Lincoln Memorial is a “temple” of equality in America. Dr. Martin Luther King recognized this with his famous ‘I Have a Dream” speech. Now that the Supreme Court has put a ‘shoulder to the wheel’, what is our dream?a
Just as Martin Luther King believed in equality regardless of skin color, we believe in equality regardless of size. Life begins, like everything else, at the beginning. We believe in the equal humanity and personhood of the preborn child from the moment of conception.
This is our case for preborn children that in January 2023 will be taken to the nation from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial (our nation’s TEMPLE of EQUALITY). Carved in the marble above Lincoln’s statue are these words:
“In this TEMPLE, as in the hearts of the people for whom he saved the Union, the memory of Abraham Lincoln is enshrined forever.”
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
Martin Palmer
The Necessary Supreme Court Demonstration
Dear friends and family of the preborn child,
Having experienced demonstrations outside of their homes, perhaps the 5 conservative justices will want to expand their upcoming opinion to protect children from the moment of conception under the United States Constitution notwithstanding any state law currently on the books or to be passed in the future to the contrary.
In the past couple years, New York, Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts have passed laws prohibiting any meaningful restrictions on the killing of preborn children in the womb, emerging from the womb and arguably beyond.
Governor Gavin Newsom and other democratic politicians are determined to make their state a ‘sanctuary for abortion’. They plan to bring that about not only by paying for abortions for women coming from out of state but also by paying for their travel and lodging.
The actions of culture of death states (their legislators and governors) will inevitably be challenged in the courts and wind up back on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court one at a time. A declaration by the Court of a constitutional right to life of preborn children from conception would end this (for the Supreme Court) from the beginning. The Supreme Court would have spoken and there would be no point in hearing an appeal to continue abortion at different stages in different pro-abort states.
Perhaps these demonstrations in front of the judge’s homes may even strengthen their resolve to do what is right (right makes might) from the very beginning and not just pass the buck (and a hot potato) off to the states in which case it is going to end up back in the Court’s lap with more demonstrations outside their homes, case by case.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
Martin Palmer
What the Supreme Court Really Needs to Say
As this is dictated on May 3rd, the nation woke up to the fact that a draft of a majority opinion authored by Justice Alito has been leaked (https://www.ewtn.com/tv/shows/ewtn-news-in-depth), indicating that the U.S. Supreme Court is about to relegate Roe and Casey to the dust bin of history. What the Supreme Court really needs to say is sadly missing.
Roe was an abomination that taught our nation to sin by violating God’s Commandment ‘THOU SHALT NOT KILL’. Senator Schumer came into the well of the Senate this morning and called this draft of a majority opinion of the Supreme Court an ‘abomination’. The devilish mischief is always to turn the truth around.
Life begins, like everything else, at the beginning. Our nation’s Declaration of Independence bespeaks the truth:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are CREATED equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Other nations of the world have respected and even revered these words in our Declaration of Independence as great TRUTH. Many feel that our Declaration of Independence was ‘inspired’. True inspiration comes from the Holy Spirit. No wonder these words have inspired other young democracies all over the world.
The renowned constitutional law professor John W. Brabner-Smith (founder of the International School of Law in Washington, DC – now known as George Mason University Law School) often compared our Declaration of Independence to the charter of a corporation. He compared the Constitution itself to the bylaws of a corporation. He pointed out that it is a sound principle of law that the bylaws of a corporation can never contradict the charter. It followed for him that a ‘right to abortion’ which the Roe court read into the Constitution was in direct conflict with the ‘charter’ of our nation (Declaration of Independence).
The draft majority opinion that was leaked says that the decision on abortion should be returned to the people (meaning the people of the respective states). It would have been wonderful if the court had gone on to say that in the intervening half century since Roe, technology has put windows on the womb and in vitro fertilization has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that life begins, like everything else, at the beginning, and that the preborn child is an equal member of the community of man from the moment of that child’s CREATION.
Such a ruling would be in accord with our nation’s charter (the Declaration of Independence) and it would prevent the inevitable division that is about to take place among the states of the Union with some standing with the preborn child, and others turning their back on the preborn child (the culture of life v. the culture of death).
History does not always repeat itself but it rhymes. Just as at the time of the Civil War when we had free states and pro-slavery states, many states will now set the preborn child free while others will keep the preborn child in chains to the master of deceit who has loved death and dying from the beginning. He will continue to promote it with his lies because he has been a liar from the beginning and the truth is not in him. We must remember that Lincoln was quoting Christ when he said “a house divided cannot stand”.
Schumer and company, while they have a democratic majority, will try to head the Supreme Court off at the pass by pushing for federal legislation guaranteeing the ‘right’ to abortion. The Supreme Court has the final say and such a law would be struck down.
The Supreme Court needs to come out and protect preborn children across the board – across all states – and stand for the truth that God has written upon every human heart for we are CREATED in His Image and commanded THOU SHALT NOT KILL.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
R. Martin Palmer
P.S. Reverend Billy Graham said it: “Those who are persecuted for “righteousness sake” are happy because they are identified with Christ. The enmity of the world is tangible proof that we are on the right side, and that we are identified with our blessed Lord.”
Blessed Are the Peacemakers
Dear friends and family of the preborn child,
At the time of World War II, the devil worked his mischief on two fronts – Western Europe (Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini) and simultaneously in the Pacific (Japan).
After Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor (December 7, 1941), we entered the war on both fronts. The war was won in Europe with conventional weapons. President Truman’s order to drop the world’s first nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the war in the Pacific.
Now, the world is placed in peril by devilish mischief again on two fronts – Europe and the Pacific (Communist China eying Taiwan). History does not always repeat itself, but it rhymes.
In the intervening years, nuclear weapons have proliferated. Since the invention of gun powder man has never contrived a weapon he has not eventually fought it out with. In 2022, the world figuratively finds itself standing ankle deep in a room filled with gasoline and Putin is about to light a match.
BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS.
Human life and liberty are precious. The national sin of abortion has sadly taken the lives of 60 million innocent preborn children since the travesty and tragedy of Roe which has cheapened all human life from conception to old age.
Dr. Jerome Lejeune said it:
“If big Russian learns it is okay to kill little Russian
and big American learns it is okay to kill little American
then you are not going to tell big Russian it is not okay to kill big American,
and you are not going to tell big American it is not okay to kill big Russian.”
Nuclear war: just a few years away”
— Dr. Jerome Lejeune
The U.S. Supreme Court has probably never thought of itself as a peacemaker (Blessed are the Peacemakers) but it has an opportunity to be just that. Our nation and the world awaits the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on the case which has been argued before them which will either continue the travesty and tragedy of Roe or relegate Roe to the dust bin of history.
If instead of getting down Pontius Pilate’s bowl and washing their hands of Roe and returning the decision to the 50 states, they stand up for God’s COMMANDMENT ‘THOU SHALT NOT KILL’ and rule that the life and liberty of preborn children are protected under the nation’s Declaration of Independence (endowed by their Creator with right to life) and the Constitution of the nation since science (in vitro fertilization) and technology (ultrasound) in the intervening 49 years since Roe has proven that life begins, like everything else, at the beginning….Such a ruling by the Supreme Court would reverse Dr. Lejeune’s formula and prophecy and make us worthy of our national motto “In God We Trust”.
In these perilous times, the U.S. Supreme court has an opportunity to be a peacemaker if we accept Dr. Lejeune’s formula. Right makes might and such a right declared by the U.S. Supreme Court (they can hand their decision down immediately and not wait until just before leaving for their vacation in June) would please God above. If there ever was a time we need the King of Heaven’s Armies on our side, it is now! BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS.
Pray for the Supreme Court and pray for our nation, our children and our grandchildren.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
R. Martin Palmer
P.S. When one visits the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC, Lincoln’s seated statue is in the center with these words inscribed above it:
“In this temple, as in the hearts of the people for whom he saved the union, the memory of Abraham Lincoln is enshrined forever”
Then if you turn and look to one wall you find carved in marble the Gettysburg Address and if you turn and look at the other wall you find a quote from Lincoln’s 2nd inaugural address.
These prophetic words of Lincoln from his 2nd inaugural are instructive to us now and they find themselves in the 7th stanza of the enclosed poem Prayer for the Preborn Child.
Our prophet Lincoln said of old
as the Civil War wore on:
“Fondly do we hope, fervently do
we pray—that this mighty scourge of
war may speedily pass away. Yet,
if God wills that it continue
until every drop of blood drawn
with the lash shall be paid by
another drawn with the Sword, then
as was said three thousand years
ago, so still it must be said,
‘the judgments of the Lord are’
true and righteous altogether.”
– Abraham Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address
But what sword can avenge the
little ones MANY MILLIONS strong?
But the nuclear sword in the enemy hand
which threatens to destroy our land
Lincoln was a prophet. Dr. Lejeune was a prophet. These two prophecies come together and speak to us and the world in the present time.
Hearing Dobbs v, Jackson Women’s Health – a Chance to Dream Equality
Dear Friends and Family of the Preborn Child,
December 2nd the Mississippi case prohibiting the killing of a preborn child after 15 weeks (Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization) came on for oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court.
We will not know the court’s decision until June. What we do know from the verbal discussion that took place is that the judges realize this is a moral question over their heads.
Martin Luther King, in prayer, decided not to lead a march to the Supreme Court but rather assemble on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in order that he might take the case for the equal humanity and personhood of the black man over the heads of the Supreme Court. He took the case in prayer to God Himself. He told the nation and the world that he had a dream.
This year, while the Supreme Court is weighing it’s decision, we need to take the case for the equal humanity and personhood of the preborn child to God Himself on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. The Supreme Court will be listening and learning.
Alveda King, niece of the late Martin Luther King, has become a forceful and persuasive pro-life spoke person. Jeanne Mancini, who heads the March for Life, may wish to invite Alveda King to speak from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and tell of her dream for preborn children. Unlike the Supreme Court, there is nothing to guard inside the Lincoln Memorial except a cold statue. A picture is worth a thousand words and in the past, pro-lifers have been pictured in the liberal press as “needing to be guarded by phalanxes of police to keep them from rioting and storming the court to get at the judges inside” – something they would never do to begin with.
In these “covid times”, a large gathering on the ellipse to hear speakers followed by a shoulder to shoulder march to the court is no longer practical – a gathering only on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial is practical (Lincoln stood for ‘equality’ – we stand for the equal humanity and personhood of the preborn child from conception). A gathering there to petition our Creator on behalf of preborn children in prayer and supplication, with Alveda King as the keynote speaker will take our case for equality and the right to life for preborn innocents to God Himself.
We are advocating for an unalienable right – a right of NATURAL LAW – a Law above the law; the Law of God Himself, enshrined and protected by the Great Commandment “THOU SHALT NOT KILL”.
In the face of such truth, the Supreme Court may be ennobled to have courage, something a majority of the Conservatives on the court seem to lack as we hear them waffle and look for a way out at the oral argument that took place before the court on December 2. As we heard the judges speak, it was apparent they were protecting their own turf and running from their consciences.
Martin Luther King connected with the conscience of the nation with his “I have a dream” speech from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. What is our dream for preborn children and the nation?
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
Martin Palmer
Right of Dads Denied
Dear Friends and Family of the Preborn Child,
We would like to ask for your prayers in the case of Ryan Ead v. Hagerstown Reproductive Health Services, 1402, CSA-REG-1402-2020. This is a father’s rights in abortion case.
On Wednesday, September 8th, I presented oral argument in that case on behalf of the father, Ryan Ead. For those of you who may be interested, the recorded oral argument can be viewed on the court’s website at https://mdcourts.gov/cosappeals/oralargumentarchives.
In the appendix to our brief in the father’s rights in abortion case we attached a copy of the Symphony of the Preborn Child containing the testimony of Dr. Jerome Lejeune in the Tennessee Frozen Human Embryo case and also the testimony of Dr, Lejeune in the Colman Case (father’s rights in abortion).
Dr. Jerome Lejeune said it:
To accept the fact that, after fertilization has taken place, a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or of opinion. The human nature of the human being from conception to old age is not a metaphysical contention. It is plain experimental evidence.” (Subcommittee on Separation of Powers, report to the Senate Judiciary Committee, S-158, 97th Congress, 1st session, 1981)
Whenever a court is called upon to make a decision, it is important that they have the best scientific testimony available to them. Dr. Lejeune’s testimony in the Tennessee Frozen Human Embryo case is timeless in its scientific accuracy, explaining that life begins, like everything else, at the beginning.
We also included in the appendix Ronald Reagan’s “Emancipation Proclamation of Preborn Children”, all of which helps to set forth the truth of the early human being that we all once were.
A ‘political rule’ is not a scientific truth. With covid, we learned the lesson to “follow the science” and that you can’t “politicize science”.
The State of Georgia now has a court date, September 24th, to show the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals why the federal court’s ruling from last year that blocked Georgia’s “heartbeat” law from taking effect is wrong. If the 11th Circuit is not persuaded to agree that the ruling is wrong, Georgia could then appeal to the Supreme Court.
If the Supreme Court took the case at that point, they would be looking at the constitutionality of the law – and of the precedent of Roe v. Wade. The U.S. Supreme Court in its present constituency will be doing just that when they take up the Georgia case and decide it in the coming year.
Fearing what the court will do, the current presidential administration will attempt to ‘pack’ the court (politicize the science with force). We need to pray.
Assuming the Court overturns Roe, it would be wonderful if in so doing they upheld, based upon science, the equal humanity and personhood of the preborn child and announced that their right to life under the 14th amendment was protected by the U.S. Constitution in all 50 states.
This is our hope. This is our prayer. But, But! – if in overturning Roe, they simply turn over the decision to the 50 states, getting down Pontius’ Pilate’s bowl, wash their hands of it and say “You 50 states figure it out on your own. Each of you do what you want.” – then we have a repeat of the Dred Scott case which held that the black man was not person but property. This led to a division of the states, civil war and the death of 750,000. Constitutional law professors are telling us that if Dred Scott had been decided in the opposite way, the Civil War could quite possibly have been avoided.
If the U.S. Supreme Court simply returns the decision to the states, the states will again be divided. This time, not over the equal humanity and personhood of the black man but rather the states will be divided over the equal humanity and personhood of all men and women as preborn children; red and yellow, black and white.
In such a situation, father’s rights in abortion will become more important. Ryan Ead was a father who felt deeply the love for his preborn child. The mother of his child was initially happy when she became pregnant by Ryan and together they called and made an appointment to begin her prenatal care with an ob/gyn doctor. She went home to spend a weekend with her mother and came back with a change of heart and telephoned instead the abortuary.
Ryan told her that he loved her enough that he would support her no matter what her decision was and went with her to the abortuary. Sitting in the waiting room with her, he broke down and implored her not to kill their preborn child. The staff overheard him and called the police. He called my office. I walked up the street to the Hagerstown abortuary and found him seated outside with his head between his knees – crying profusely.
The Planned Parenthood lawyers point to the Supreme Court cases of Danforth and Casey for the proposition they seek to put forth that Fathers have no rights in abortion under Supreme Court precedent. But both Danforth and Casey dealt with laws that contained blanket provisions. In Danforth, a state law gave a father a right to veto an abortion for any reason or no reason at all. In Casey, there was a blanket provision requiring notice of an abortion to be given to a father. In both cases, the Supreme Court struck down these laws as overly broad. But I know of no Supreme Court case in which the rights of an individual father in an individual set of circumstances, has been adjudicated. Indeed, anywhere in the nation where this has come up, they seek to hurry up and complete the abortion so as to “moot” the case (as they did in our case).
Roe v. Wade itself is a classic example of non-mootness. In Roe, the baby had already been born but Justice Blackmun had said that the case was “capable of repetition yet evading review” and for that reason, he created an exception to mootness. Indeed, anywhere in the nation where this has come up it never gets to the appellate court because the preborn children are aborted, mooting the case (certainly part of the modus operandi of Planned Parenthood lawyers).
The rights of the fathers need to be enunciated and addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court itself, especially where the mind of the mother has been in a state of equipoise on this life and death decision (it can lead to post abortion syndrome for her).
Dr. Lejeune pointed out that in the early stages of pregnancy, the preborn child is taking vitamins and minerals from the mother’s blood and this is creating a natural down period of depression for the mother. So you can have a married couple who are initially very happy about the fact that they are expecting a child and the mother could have a change of heart during this period that she would later regret.
Fathers need to have a right to come in and seek and obtain from the court a TRO (temporary restraining order) stopping the music long enough that more deliberate and reasoned consideration of the decision can take place. At a minimum, the father should have a right to take part in counseling with a medical professional in the presence of the mother on this life and death decision that can result in deep depression and even PTSD for the father.
Pray for Ryan Ead’s case before the Court of Special Appeals in Maryland. Pray that the hearts and minds of the judges will be open to the needs of preborn children whose fathers want them and want to save them.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
R. Martin Palmer
A State Standing Up to Roe
Dear Friends and Family of the Preborn Child,
The apostle Paul told us in 1 Corinthians 3:19 that the book of Job says that God uses man’s own brilliance to trap him.
In Roe v. Wade, Justice Blackmun, writing for the majority, said
“If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment.” (Roe Et Al. V. Wade, District Attorney Of Dallas County, No. 70-18, Supreme Court Of The United States, 410 U.S. 113, January 22, 1973, Opinion of the Court delivered by Justice Blackmun, Section IX, paragraph 1)
Science Discovers What God Has Already Said
In today’s world we are told to “follow the science”. Again, Dr. Jerome Lejeune put it this way: “If you ask science, ‘What is a human being?’ science responds, ‘A human being is a member of our species.’ and if you ask science ‘What is a person?’ science responds, ‘A person is a human being alive.’ and science has no other answer.”
God tells us in His Holy Word that He knew us before we were born.
“Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you…” Jeremiah 1:5
“Even before I was born, God called me to be His…” Galatians 1:15
Simplified Living Bible Text, Thomas Nelson Publishers
God is knowing a person; not a mass of cells. In the intervening 48 years since Roe, science has proven that life begins, like everything else, at the beginning. Dr. Lejeune gave proof of this in the Tennessee Frozen Human Embryo case.
Medical technology has put windows on the womb (real time 3D ultrasound). And so, the first pictures to go in the baby book of the new person the parents will call Mary or Peter, is of ultrasound images that mom brings home from the doctor of this new little person.
God makes human wisdom foolishness. The purported wisdom of Justice Blackmun and the six other judges who joined with him (Justice Rehnquist and Justice White dissenting) has been shown to be foolishness. All judges of the Roe court are, of course, now deceased.
The Travesty of Roe
The travesty of Roe v. Wade was a grave error of the court resulting in an American holocaust of preborn children, the silent screams of which are now turning into audible screams on the streets and sidewalks of American cities.
One, and now two generations of American children have come of age in a land in which the Supreme Court taught the woman that it was okay to break the Commandment Thou Shalt Not Kill and take the life of her preborn child who may be inconvenient to her.
Protecting the sanctity of human life is a little like cupping water in your hands. You must hold your fingers very tightly. If you give just a little bit, you lose it all. In other words, if you lose respect for the sanctity of life at the beginning of life, you pull the golden thread that permeates all of life. The alarming increase in shootings and homicides is now unfolding and it goes without saying that if you lose respect for life, you lose respect for property rights of human beings as well (burning and looting of our cities).
Mississippi Stands
In taking the Mississippi case, the court has signaled that it wants to take another look at Roe. It would be wonderful if the court would embrace the equal humanity and personhood of the preborn child from conception and rule that the right to life of preborn children is protected under the United States Constitution from the moment of conception.
Rather than wait for the Supreme Court to overturn the error of Roe (and we have waited half a century – the present Administration is threatening to pack the court to prevent it), the states are increasingly relying upon state’s rights under the 9th and 10th amendments to the Constitution to stand up for and protect the equal humanity and personhood of the preborn child. God Himself supports them in this and if you have the King of Heaven’s Armies on your side those states are in pretty good company.
Pray for preborn children everywhere.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
Will you partner with us?
P.S. As an attorney admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court and founder of the NAAPC, I am thinking of doing an amicus brief (“Friend of the Court” brief) in the Mississippi case. When any court is called upon to make an important decision, it is imperative that they have the best expert testimony before them.
My thought is to get before the Court the wisdom of Dr. Lejeune’s testimony in the Tennessee Frozen Human Embryo case which led Judge Dale W. Young of the Blount County Circuit Court in Maryville, Tennessee, to rule for the first time in history that human embryos are “children in vitro”.
Bringing a case before the U.S. Supreme Court is a major undertaking and if anyone would like to partner with us and assist with the expense of such an amicus brief kindly let us know (phone 301-790-0640).
Lootings, and Shootings and Murders, Oh My!
Dear Friends and Family of the Preborn Child,
All the news commentators are talking about the increase in shootings and murders in American cities.
A number of years ago, when Dr. Jerome Lejeune was in Washington D.C. speaking as part of a program put on by the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family, my wife and I had occasion to meet him and take him to lunch.
That morning the Washington news reported that a young teenager had shot and killed another boy and I mentioned it to Dr. Lejeune. I will always remember his response and I have come to think of it as prophetic. He replied “Yes, we have the same thing in Paris…” and he went on to opine that when children are learning that their own mother killed (by abortion) their brother or sister then these children grow up not to respect the sanctity of human life themselves.”
Everyone is asking what can be done about the increase in shootings and murders in our cities. The answer is to restore police funding and defund Planned Parenthood!
Our nation has sown the wind (Roe v. Wade) and we are now reaping the whirlwind. We need to put prayer to God back in our children’s schools and respect for His Laws and Commandments (Thou Shalt Not Kill) back in their hearts.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
R. Martin Palmer
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next Page »