Legislation - NAAPC

Dobb’s Ripple Effect?

August 9, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

When Justice Clarence Thomas voted with the majority to overturn Roe, in a separate concurring opinion, he spoke of the need for the court to examine other past decisions that also were erroneous – supposed ‘constitutional rights’ that the court had entirely made up just as the Roe court had made up a ‘constitutional right’ to abortion nowhere to be found in the Constitution itself. Justice Thomas in his concurring opinion put it this way:

“…we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,…”

To review, Griswold, a 1965 case, was about the right of married people to obtain contraceptives. Lawrence, a 2003 case, involved the right to engage in consensual sexual acts. Obergefell, a 2015 case, involved the right to homosexual ‘marriage’.

Justice Thomas is saying that the court cannot choose to do only ‘selective housecleaning’. As an example, the ‘constitutional right’ to same sex ‘marriage’ is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution any more than the ‘constitutional right’ to abortion is to be found in the Constitution.

Justices Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan, the liberals on the court picked up on this in their joint dissent in Dobb’s:

“What, then, of the right to contraception or samesex marriage? Would it be ‘scrupulously neutral’ for the Court to eliminate those rights too? The point of all these examples is that when it comes to rights, the Court does not act ‘neutrally’ when it leaves everything up to the States.”

Clarence Thomas in his concurring opinion has become the ‘intellectual conscience’ of the court. You can’t choose to selectively houseclean and be intellectually honest at the same time. You cannot take a new broom and sweep clean one portion of room while at the same time neglecting the rest of the dirt on the floor.

If the Supreme Court (broom) is not willing to finish the job, why not the broom of certain states? If the Court is not willing to use their broom to finish the job of sweeping out the dirt of entirely contrived so-called ‘constitutional rights’, what is to prevent the states from doing it for them? The answer is that the states can take their own broom in hand under the license granted in Dobb’s.

In sending the decision on abortion back to the states, the Supreme Court in its opinion talked much of the history of the nation and how things were at the time of the ratification of the Constitution – the powers and rights of the states were to be preserved and respected. The court put it this way at page 77 of the Dobb’s opinion; granting a license to the states:

“That respect for a legislature’s judgment applies even when the laws at issue concern matters of great social significance and moral substance.” (emphasis added – Dobb’s page 77)

Whether it was meant to be a signal to the states or not, herein lies an invitation to the people of the states in matters of ‘great social significance and moral substance’ to take up their own broom. As an example, the court entirely made up a right to homosexual ‘marriage’ in the Obergefell case. Justice Antonin Scalia adamantly dissented to what was done in Obergefell and reasserted the right of citizens to govern themselves through their elected federal – and state – representatives.

“Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact – and the furthest extension one can even imagine – of the Court’s claimed power to create “liberties” that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention. This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.” Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015).

Following Dobb’s, the people of the states now have the liberty to outlaw abortion from the moment of conception if they so desire. The Supreme Court will respect the decision of the people of a state acting through their elected representatives in the state legislatures.

What if the legislature of a state decides that same sex ‘marriage’ is not to be performed or recognized in that state? The state would be acting in a matter of ‘great social significance and moral substance’ and the Supreme Court would be obligated to uphold and respect such a state law:

“That respect for a legislature’s judgment applies even when the laws at issue concern matters of great social significance and moral substance.” (emphasis added – Dobb’s page 77)

At the same time, as with abortion, the court could point out that other states may choose to recognize same sex ‘marriage’ just as they may choose to continue to legalize abortion. Yes, it is dividing the nation (we already refer to red states and blue states). But until the Supreme Court is willing to heed Clarence Thomas’ advice and “reconsider all the courts substantive due process precedents” including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell, the division between the states will only grow.

The unalienable right to life immortalized in the Declaration of Independence {the charter of our nation} trumps the other side’s so-called ‘right to abortion’), but until the court steps up to the plate and reverses the past “egregious errors” of the court – such as the supposed finding of a ‘constitutional right’ to same sex ‘marriage’ denigrating, dishonoring, and disrespecting God’s holy sacrament and institution of marriage – the states will remain divided on this and other issues of ‘great social significance and moral substance’.

An old broom knows the corners. Clarence Thomas, the now senior member of the court, has become the ‘intellectual conscience’ of the court and has warned the others that they were being intellectually dishonest by leaving in place other ‘egregious’ errors of the court that found supposed constitutional rights nowhere mentioned in the Constitution.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

R. Martin Palmer

P.S. For those of you wishing to read the Dobb’s case that overturned Roe in its entirety, it may be found on our website (naapc.org). We enlarged its small print electronically so that when you print it off it is easier to read.

You also may want to lobby your own state legislators to take the people’s broom in hand and clean up the dirt left by the Supreme Court.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

Martin Palmer

Annual Celebration of Life

August 9, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

The annual March for Life could very well be renamed a “CELEBRATION OF LIFE” to be held on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial where Dr. Martin Luther gave his “I have a Dream” speech. What is our dream for preborn children now that their fate is in the hands of the state legislatures?

History does not necessarily repeat itself, but it rhymes. At the time of the Civil War, the states of the Union were divided over the equal humanity of the slaves. President Abraham Lincoln issued his Emancipation Proclamation of the Slaves on January 1, 1863.

One hundred and twenty five years later, as our nation became more and more divided over the equal humanity of preborn children following Roe, President Ronald Reagan issued his Emancipation ‘Proclamation of Preborn Children’ in January of 1988.

Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim and declare the unalienable personhood of every American, from the moment of conception until natural death, and I do proclaim, ordain, and declare that I will take care that the Constitution and laws of the United States are faithfully executed for the protection of America’s unborn children. Upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind and the gracious favor of Almighty God. I also proclaim Sunday, January 17, 1988, as National Sanctity of Human Life Day. I call upon the citizens of this blessed land to gather on that day in their homes and places of worship to give thanks for the gift of life they enjoy and to reaffirm their commitment to the dignity of every human being and the sanctity of every human life.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of January, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twelfth.

Ronald Reagan

[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 10:50 a.m., January 15, 1988]

Abraham Lincoln’s words were TRUTH. Ronald Reagan’s words are TRUTH. The truth will set preborn children free.

Our nation needs prayer. Our nation needs healing. Would it not be appropriate this January to gather on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial (our nation’s temple to equality) and have speakers such as Vice President Mike Pence be invited by Jeanne Mancini to tell of our dream for preborn children throughout the land?

As we celebrate the gift of life, it is a time of repentance and a time to ask for forgiveness of the nation over the sin of abortion. At the time of Ronald Reagan’s 2^nd inaugural, he let it be known that when he took his oath of office, he would be placing his hand upon his mother’s Bible that would be open to

2 Chronicles 7:14 because he thought that it was the message to the nation at this time in our history.

“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” (2 Chronicles 7:14)

The annual March to the Supreme Court now comes to an end. We have taken our case to the Supreme Court these many years and we have won with the court.

Now we must win with the hearts and minds of men and their elected representatives in state legislatures. An annual “CELEBRATION OF LIFE” event needs to be held in the nation’s capital each and every year until the lives of preborn children are protected throughout the land. Share your thoughts with Jeanne Mancini, president of the March for Life.

TRUTH will set the preborn child free.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

Martin Palmer

DOBBS, STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION ET AL

July 8, 2022 by admin Leave a Comment

Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act provides that “[e]xcept in a medical emergency or in the case of a severe fetal abnormality, a person shall not intentionally or knowingly perform … or induce an abortion of an unborn human being if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen (15) weeks.” Miss. Code Ann. §41–41–191. Respondents—Jackson Women’s Health Organization, an abortion clinic, and one of its doctors—challenged the Act in Federal District court, alleging that it violated this Court’s precedents establishing a constitutional right to abortion, in particular Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113, and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents and permanently enjoined enforcement of the Act, reasoning that Mississippi’s 15-week restriction on abortion violates this Court’s cases forbidding States to ban abortion pre-viability. The Fifth Circuit affirmed. Before this Court, petitioners defend the Act on the grounds that Roe and Casey were wrongly decided and that the Act is constitutional because it satisfies rational-basis review…

Click HERE to continue reading, or HERE to download the full opinion.

The Court’s Moral Imperative is Clear

June 21, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

The nation and the world knows of the leaked draft of the case that will overturn Roe. As we await the final opinion and the demonstrators wait in the wings, an uncertain summer lies ahead, yet the court’s moral imperative is clear.

As the draft opinion is written, on the one hand it overturns Roe, but on the other hand it fails to find a ‘right to life’ in the nation’s documents (as in the unalienable right to life plainly stated in the Declaration of Independence, our nation’s charter).

On the one hand they strike down Roe that legalized abortion, but on the other hand fail to find anything wrong with abortion (except to observe that all states criminalized abortion prior to Roe). Failing to find fault with abortion the court sends a message that there is no right or wrong with killing preborn children – no absolutes – all that matters is those who speak the loudest. But, we must contrast that with those who cannot speak for themselves. It was President Ronald Reagan who observed: “I have noticed that most of the people who are for abortion have already been born.”

But there are absolutes. One such absolute written in stone by God Himself for Moses is this: Thou Shalt Not Kill.

In the Supreme Court chamber, high up on the marble frieze, directly above the center of the judges’ bench, is a depiction of Moses holding the Ten Commandment plaque. If our Supreme Court is reticent to mention God, they should certainly not be reticent to mention the unalienable, God-given right to life found in our nation’s own Declaration of Independence:

“…that all men are created equal (from conception is implied), that they are endowed by their Creator (God) with certain UNALIENABLE Rights, that among these are LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…” (italics added)

Once you appeal to and touch the gold standard – God given unalienable rights – you have established a right and a wrong. The court’s moral imperative is clear. Those who want to continue to do wrong will attempt to do so forcing their will upon the courts and legislatures, but they will know they are fighting a moral imperative that is beyond any court or legislature. They are fighting God Himself and not an ambivalent draft of a court opinion that takes no stand with the moral imperative, but leaves the lives of millions of preborn children to the political process in the States, and hence upcoming demonstrations across the country.

If the Supreme Court stands for the moral imperative the demonstrations are kept in Washington at the U.S. Supreme Court itself while the judges are out of town on summer recess. There is nothing to be gained from the state legislatures (the Supreme Court will have spoken that abortion is wrong).

The court (the conservative majority) needs to walk into their own courtroom while it is empty – go out into the seating of the gallery and look up at the 3 dimensional relief, a marble frieze, that is positioned directly over the center of the bench where the chief judge traditionally sits and contemplate the representation of Moses with a long beard holding the stone Ten Commandment plaque in his arms.

Someone has said that most all of the Commandments can be reduced to just one: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”. Applying the golden rule to the momentous decision they are called upon to make, the judges may wish to reflect on how it would be if they were just entering the world as a preborn child and some judge was about to decide their fate. They need to reflect on their own lives and their own walk of faith and whether or not they feel it is providential to be called to this hour of great decision for their republic.

The prayers of all of us are with the court at this time as they themselves assuredly pray for wisdom, divine direction and protection. Psalm 111 reminds us that the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

R. Martin Palmer

SCOTUS failing to Protect our Nation’s Charter

June 2, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

Dear friends and family of the preborn child,

This horrible tragedy at the elementary school in Texas has touched the hearts of all of us even though we did not personally know the children who were killed.

Why is it that the hearts of an entire nation are united in grief over the loss of these innocent elementary school children that they did not personally know and yet that same nation is divided on the killing of preborn children they similarly do not know.

God knows all preborn children. God knows us before we are born.

(“Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you.” Jeremiah 1:5)

We are now told that at the elementary school in Texas 16 police officers were present but were ordered by their commanding officer to “stand down” and wait for the SWAT team to arrive. During the 45 minute period that they waited, it is reported that calls continued to come into 911 in which gun shots were heard in the background and little voices were pleading ‘send the police’; ‘please send help’.

In 1973, the ‘chief of police’ of the States (the U.S. Supreme Court) ordered the States to ‘stand down’ and stop enforcing their criminal laws that rescued preborn children. During the half century that has followed, 911 calls have come in to the U.S. Supreme Court from across the nation pleading with the court to send help and stop the killing of preborn children.

The court, our nation’s ‘police chief’ of the Constitution, is now poised to strike down to overturn Roe, but the devilish mischief having its way with the court even now is to leave the decision on what is to be done after Roe entirely up to the States. The court does so while totally ignoring the charter of our nation (the Declaration of Independence) and the unalienable rights recited therein which gives our nation’s ‘police chief’ (the court) authority to go in and rescue preborn children immediately.

Professor John W. Brabner-Smith, founder of the International School of Law in Washington, DC, now the George Mason School of Law, explained to his students that the Declaration of Independence is, in truth, the Charter of our nation. The Constitution can be compared to bylaws, he taught. He went on to remind his students that it is a principle of law that nothing in the bylaws can conflict with the charter. Roe was flagrantly in conflict with the nation’s charter.

The brilliant mind of John W. Brabner-Smith is now illuminating the path our nation’s court must follow. The Roe court acted as if they could read between the lines and find an implicit ‘right to abortion’. Actually, they manufactured it out of thin air. John Brabner-Smith responded to this over the years teaching the unalienable rights found plainly in the Declaration itself.

This time around, the court doesn’t have to make anything up. It can simply point to what is already there! A right to life is clearly assumed in the Constitution in two amendments and this is reflected in the history of the criminal laws of all the States (As Justice Alito goes to great length to show, throughout our nation’s history the States condemned abortion as a crime – see pages 15 to 29 and the list of historical statutes in the appendix of the draft opinion of the court.)

God writes his laws on the mind and heart of man. The pro-aborts know in their mind and in their heart that abortion kills an innocent preborn child. They are in rebellion against God and determined to do it anyway.

The unalienable rights of man are written upon the mind and heart of mankind. The charter of our nation (The Declaration of Independence) recites some of them. They are the ‘law above the law’ and as such are beyond the province or jurisdiction of any court or legislature.

Those justices of our Supreme Court understanding this, and not in rebellion against this truth (the conservative majority), need only revise their draft opinion in the Mississippi case to proclaim the truth in words similar to the following:

‘ABORTION PRESENTS A PROFOUND MORAL QUESTION. We hold that Roe was egregiously wrong. It follows that Roe was egregiously MORALLY wrong in that it has allowed the killing of an estimated 60 million preborn American children – our posterity. Our Declaration of Independence speaks of the “laws of nature and nature’s God” referring to the ‘law above the law’, the law beyond the province of this court or any legislature. The Declaration of Independence proclaims that “all men are CREATED equal and endowed by their CREATOR with certain unalienable rights, and that among these are the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” We hereby hold that every human being from the moment of creation (conception) is protected by the UNALIENABLE RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

R. Martin Palmer

Notes on Leaked SCOTUS Opinion

June 2, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

Memo-Notes-regarding-leaked-SCOTUS-draft Download

A National Charter Without Fear

May 25, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

On Friday, May 20^th, we woke to the happy news that the legislature of the great state of Oklahoma passed a law prohibiting abortion from the moment of conception (the only exceptions being rape and incest), and the governor said he would sign it. This was the law of my state of Maryland prior to Roe v. Wade taking it off the books in 1973 (indeed, all states criminalized abortion prior to 1973).

Oklahoma is leading the way for the nation and the Supreme Court needs to follow their example and rewrite this draft opinion according to our nation’s own Declaration of Independence as authority for the fact that preborn children’s lives are constitutionally protected from the moment of conception:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…”

President Ronald Reagan was understanding this, and in his National Sanctity of Human Life Day Proclamation, issued on the 14^th of January, 1988, his words in the closing paragraph thereof have become known as the “Emancipation Proclamation of Preborn Children”.

President Reagan was undoubtedly familiar with the teachings of renowned constitutional law scholar John W. Brabner-Smith, of Washington, DC, whom we spoke of in our May letter. He taught his students at the International School of Law in Washington which he founded; that the Declaration of Independence is like the charter for our nation, and that the Constitution are like the bylaws of our nation.

It is an established principle of law that nothing in the bylaws of an organization can contradict the charter. In 1973, the Supreme Court bent over backwards, reading between the lines of the Civil War 14^th amendment to declare a ‘right’ to abortion under the Constitution, and in so doing, flagrantly ignored the words of the Declaration of Independence that revered and protected preborn children, which were as plain as the nose on their faces.

The present Supreme Court is now compelled to strike down Roe as an egregious error, but in its place they must not leave a vacuum which would promote discord and dissent among the states by leaving it up to each state to decide.

When we established the nation, we didn’t say that all men will be viewed as being created equal in those colonies that believed it. We stated a truth that applied to all the colonies at the same time. Truth is universal. We can’t pick and choose. Indeed, the truths in our Declaration of Independence have been acknowledged worldwide.

The devil and his emissaries would put a spirit of fear in the Supreme Court – fear that would keep them from declaring the TRUTH that preborn human beings are recognized under our nation’s Declaration of Independence as being CREATED EQUAL and endowed by their CREATOR with… a right to life and liberty…

Pray that God will take away that spirit of fear and give the justices His Spirit of power, and of love, and of a sound mind (2 Tim. 1:7).

The court is now poised at a critical tipping point. Perhaps it’s good that the draft opinion was leaked because it would be a mistake as written. The court has the Declaration of Independence on its side. The court has the truth of medical science and genetics on its side; that life begins, like everything else, at the beginning. They can say it however they want and put these truths together however they want, but we need one truth for one nation in accord with our nation’s pledge “One Nation under God”.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

R. Martin Palmer

March For Life – New Route?

May 25, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

Dear friends and family of the preborn child,

Many people are asking the question “Since the Supreme Court is poised to overturn Roe, will there be a March for Life to the Supreme Court this coming January?” The answer is “There could be and should be if the March was from the Ellipse to the Lincoln Memorial instead of the Supreme Court”.

The Lincoln Memorial is a “temple” of equality in America. Dr. Martin Luther King recognized this with his famous ‘I Have a Dream” speech. Now that the Supreme Court has put a ‘shoulder to the wheel’, what is our dream?a

Just as Martin Luther King believed in equality regardless of skin color, we believe in equality regardless of size. Life begins, like everything else, at the beginning. We believe in the equal humanity and personhood of the preborn child from the moment of conception.

This is our case for preborn children that in January 2023 will be taken to the nation from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial (our nation’s TEMPLE of EQUALITY). Carved in the marble above Lincoln’s statue are these words:

“In this TEMPLE, as in the hearts of the people for whom he saved the Union, the memory of Abraham Lincoln is enshrined forever.”

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

Martin Palmer

The Necessary Supreme Court Demonstration

May 25, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

Dear friends and family of the preborn child,

Having experienced demonstrations outside of their homes, perhaps the 5 conservative justices will want to expand their upcoming opinion to protect children from the moment of conception under the United States Constitution notwithstanding any state law currently on the books or to be passed in the future to the contrary.

In the past couple years, New York, Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts have passed laws prohibiting any meaningful restrictions on the killing of preborn children in the womb, emerging from the womb and arguably beyond.

Governor Gavin Newsom and other democratic politicians are determined to make their state a ‘sanctuary for abortion’. They plan to bring that about not only by paying for abortions for women coming from out of state but also by paying for their travel and lodging.

The actions of culture of death states (their legislators and governors) will inevitably be challenged in the courts and wind up back on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court one at a time. A declaration by the Court of a constitutional right to life of preborn children from conception would end this (for the Supreme Court) from the beginning. The Supreme Court would have spoken and there would be no point in hearing an appeal to continue abortion at different stages in different pro-abort states.

Perhaps these demonstrations in front of the judge’s homes may even strengthen their resolve to do what is right (right makes might) from the very beginning and not just pass the buck (and a hot potato) off to the states in which case it is going to end up back in the Court’s lap with more demonstrations outside their homes, case by case.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

Martin Palmer

What the Supreme Court Really Needs to Say

May 12, 2022 by Martin Palmer Leave a Comment

As this is dictated on May 3^rd, the nation woke up to the fact that a draft of a majority opinion authored by Justice Alito has been leaked (https://www.ewtn.com/tv/shows/ewtn-news-in-depth), indicating that the U.S. Supreme Court is about to relegate Roe and Casey to the dust bin of history. What the Supreme Court really needs to say is sadly missing.

Roe was an abomination that taught our nation to sin by violating God’s Commandment ‘THOU SHALT NOT KILL’. Senator Schumer came into the well of the Senate this morning and called this draft of a majority opinion of the Supreme Court an ‘abomination’. The devilish mischief is always to turn the truth around.

Life begins, like everything else, at the beginning. Our nation’s Declaration of Independence bespeaks the truth:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are CREATED equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Other nations of the world have respected and even revered these words in our Declaration of Independence as great TRUTH. Many feel that our Declaration of Independence was ‘inspired’. True inspiration comes from the Holy Spirit. No wonder these words have inspired other young democracies all over the world.

The renowned constitutional law professor John W. Brabner-Smith (founder of the International School of Law in Washington, DC – now known as George Mason University Law School) often compared our Declaration of Independence to the charter of a corporation. He compared the Constitution itself to the bylaws of a corporation. He pointed out that it is a sound principle of law that the bylaws of a corporation can never contradict the charter. It followed for him that a ‘right to abortion’ which the Roe court read into the Constitution was in direct conflict with the ‘charter’ of our nation (Declaration of Independence).

The draft majority opinion that was leaked says that the decision on abortion should be returned to the people (meaning the people of the respective states). It would have been wonderful if the court had gone on to say that in the intervening half century since Roe, technology has put windows on the womb and in vitro fertilization has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that life begins, like everything else, at the beginning, and that the preborn child is an equal member of the community of man from the moment of that child’s CREATION.

Such a ruling would be in accord with our nation’s charter (the Declaration of Independence) and it would prevent the inevitable division that is about to take place among the states of the Union with some standing with the preborn child, and others turning their back on the preborn child (the culture of life v. the culture of death).

History does not always repeat itself but it rhymes. Just as at the time of the Civil War when we had free states and pro-slavery states, many states will now set the preborn child free while others will keep the preborn child in chains to the master of deceit who has loved death and dying from the beginning. He will continue to promote it with his lies because he has been a liar from the beginning and the truth is not in him. We must remember that Lincoln was quoting Christ when he said “a house divided cannot stand”.

Schumer and company, while they have a democratic majority, will try to head the Supreme Court off at the pass by pushing for federal legislation guaranteeing the ‘right’ to abortion. The Supreme Court has the final say and such a law would be struck down.

The Supreme Court needs to come out and protect preborn children across the board – across all states – and stand for the truth that God has written upon every human heart for we are CREATED in His Image and commanded THOU SHALT NOT KILL.

Yours very sincerely and respectfully,

R. Martin Palmer

P.S. Reverend Billy Graham said it: “Those who are persecuted for “righteousness sake” are happy because they are identified with Christ. The enmity of the world is tangible proof that we are on the right side, and that we are identified with our blessed Lord.”

Please choose a language.

Search Our Site

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE THE LATEST NEWS